Skip to content
Guide library

Guide 04 / 9 min read

Commissioning, calibration and monitoring for HES basin dosing

Direct answer

Commissioning proves the dosing station delivers what it is meant to, against real inflow and chemistry. Calibration sets and verifies that delivery and any instruments involved. Monitoring shows whether the basin is performing. Together they need written procedures and records, and a defined list of events that trigger recalibration. Equipment that fails calibration should not be used until the problem is resolved.

What governs your site. Project approvals, design documents, regulator requirements, SDS and manufacturer instructions, and engineering advice govern the site-specific approach. This guide is general information for planning and discussion. It does not set doses, discharge limits or compliance outcomes for any site.

Three different jobs

Commissioning, calibration and monitoring are often blurred together. Separating them clarifies who does what.

  • Commissioning: proving the installed system works as a whole, from chemical storage through to basin response.
  • Calibration: setting and checking the accuracy of dosing output and of instruments such as pH meters or flow measurement.
  • Monitoring: routinely observing the basin and treated water to see whether performance is holding.

Quality assurance is more than a number

Queensland quality assurance material describes calibration processes, written procedures and record keeping as parts of QA, and says equipment that fails calibration should not be used until the issue is resolved [3]. That is a clear working rule. If an instrument or dosing pump cannot be shown to be accurate, the readings and dosing that depend on it are open to doubt.

In practice, this means a short written procedure for each routine task, a log that records who did what and when, and a rule for what happens when something fails a check.

A commissioning sequence that holds up

The order matters. Each step relies on the previous one being sound.

  • Inspect the installation: tanks, bunding, pipework, power, access, injection point and sampling points.
  • Prove delivery: measure what the pump delivers at its settings, rather than relying on nameplate values.
  • Check instruments: calibrate and record before relying on any reading.
  • Confirm chemistry: reconcile the chosen product and starting basis with jar testing on site water.
  • Observe response: run across a range of inflow conditions where possible and record the basin and outlet water.
  • Hand over: operator is trained, procedures are on site, and recalibration triggers are agreed.

Instrument practice

General field-instrument guidance calls for calibrating before use, bracketing the expected range of readings with calibration standards where appropriate, keeping records, and checking for drift [6]. It is general technical practice, not Australian construction compliance guidance, but the habits transfer well.

For field meters, that means calibrating at the start of each use period, using standards that surround the readings you expect, and re-checking after the work to see whether the instrument drifted. Record the standards used, the readings and the date. Keep probes clean and stored as the manufacturer directs.

Monitoring that the team will actually do

A monitoring plan that is too heavy will not be followed. Keep it targeted and tied to decisions. Use sampling practice appropriate to the work; the Queensland Monitoring and Sampling Manual is the state reference [4]. Project approvals and regulator requirements set any mandatory monitoring [2].

  • Where samples are taken, and why those points were chosen.
  • How often, and what additional sampling follows rain or a change in conditions.
  • What is measured at each point, and with which calibrated instrument.
  • Who reviews the results, and what they do when results move.

Recalibration triggers

Write the triggers into the commissioning pack so the operator is not guessing. Typical prompts include the following.

  • Any instrument fails a calibration check or shows drift against standards.
  • The dosing pump, tubing, injection point or controller is repaired, replaced or moved.
  • The chemical product, supplier batch or concentration changes.
  • The inlet position, flow path or basin configuration changes.
  • Site water changes character, for example after rain, a new catchment or a new soil type.
  • Observed basin performance departs from what was seen at commissioning.
  • A scheduled interval set in the procedure has passed.

Commissioning and monitoring record

  • Written procedure exists for calibration, dosing checks and sampling.
  • Delivery from the dosing pump has been measured and recorded.
  • Each instrument has a dated calibration entry with the standards used.
  • Drift checks are scheduled and logged.
  • Sampling points, frequency and responsibilities are set.
  • Recalibration triggers are written and known to the operator.
  • Failed-calibration equipment is tagged out until resolved.
  • Records are kept somewhere they can be produced on request.

Decision points

If: An instrument fails a calibration check
Tag it out, resolve the fault, recalibrate and record. Review readings taken since the last good check.
If: The pump or tubing is replaced
Re-measure delivery before returning to normal operation.
If: Basin response differs from commissioning
Check chemistry, inflow, hydraulics and instruments before changing dose.
If: The operator or shift crew changes
Confirm the procedure and logs are understood, and walk through the system together.

Limitations and caveats

  • Calibration records show instrument and dosing accuracy. They do not on their own demonstrate that a release requirement has been met.
  • The US EPA document is general field-instrument guidance, not Australian construction compliance guidance.
  • Mandatory monitoring, reporting and record keeping come from project approvals and regulator requirements, which take precedence over this guide.
  • Project approvals, design documents, regulator requirements, SDS and manufacturer instructions, and engineering advice govern the site-specific approach. This guide is general information for planning and discussion. It does not set doses, discharge limits or compliance outcomes for any site.

Sources

  1. [2] Queensland Government, Procedural guide for releases to waters from land development and construction sites 2500m² and greater (PDF)

    The Queensland procedural guide for water releases from larger sites. Read it directly for the requirements that apply to your project.

  2. [3] Queensland Government, Quality assurance and quality control (Reviewed 7 July 2025)

    Calibration processes, written procedures and record keeping are part of quality assurance. Equipment that fails calibration should not be used until the problem is resolved.

  3. [4] Queensland Government, Queensland Monitoring and Sampling Manual 2018 (2018)

    Queensland reference for monitoring and sampling practice.

  4. [6] General technical reference, not Australian construction compliance guidanceUS EPA Region 1, Calibration of Field Instruments (Revised 2017)

    General instrument practice only: calibrate before use, bracket the expected range where appropriate, keep records and check for drift. It is not Australian construction compliance guidance.

Talk to an engineer about your basin

Send location, basin arrangement, programme and approval conditions. Sampling and jar testing may be part of scoping.